↓ Skip to main content

Understanding the Relationship Between Readmission and Quality of Hospital Care in Heart Failure

Overview of attention for article published in Current Heart Failure Reports, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Understanding the Relationship Between Readmission and Quality of Hospital Care in Heart Failure
Published in
Current Heart Failure Reports, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11897-014-0209-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren Gray Gilstrap, Karen E. Joynt

Abstract

Hospital readmission rates for heart failure (HF) are increasingly seen as a quality metric and are being used to define reimbursement rates and penalize underperforming hospitals. As disease patterns shift from single acute episodes of illness to more chronic and degenerative diseases, healthcare systems across the country are grappling with the challenge of providing quality care while simultaneously controlling both readmission rates and spending. Using HF as a prototypical example of chronic illness, this review begins by describing the historical underpinnings of readmission rates and how they have become a mainstream metric of healthcare quality. It then examines the controversial relationship between hospital quality and readmission rates. The paper examines several strategies to decrease readmission rates, including discharge planning and readmission reduction programs, as well as the relationship between readmission rates and mortality rates. The principal drivers of readmissions are discussed and the impact of new readmission-based financial policy is explored as well.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Master 4 19%
Other 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Decision Sciences 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2014.
All research outputs
#18,376,056
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Current Heart Failure Reports
#242
of 315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,622
of 227,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Heart Failure Reports
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.