| Title |
Slow Money for Soft Energy: Lessons for Energy Finance from the Slow Money Movement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-012-0329-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Beaudry E. Kock |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 14% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 21% |
| Engineering | 2 | 14% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2014.
All research outputs
#15,303,896
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#1,429
of 1,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,959
of 164,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#14
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.