↓ Skip to main content

Invisible populations: parallels between the health of people with intellectual disability and people of a refugee background

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Journal of Primary Health, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Invisible populations: parallels between the health of people with intellectual disability and people of a refugee background
Published in
Australian Journal of Primary Health, September 2011
DOI 10.1071/py10022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire E. Brolan, Robert S. Ware, Nicholas G. Lennox, Miriam Taylor Gomez, Margaret Kay, Peter S. Hill

Abstract

When considering the delivery of primary health care in the community, some populations remain virtually invisible. While people with intellectual disability might seem to share few characteristics with refugees and humanitarian entrants, there are a number of difficulties that both groups share when accessing and receiving primary health care. Commonalities include communication barriers, difficulties accessing past medical records and the complexity of health needs that confront the practitioner providing health care. These issues and additional systemic barriers that prevent the delivery of optimal health care to both groups are explored. Integrated multidisciplinary care is often required for the delivery of best practice care; however, such care can be difficult for each group to access. In May 2010, the specific Medicare Health Assessment Item numbers for both of these groups were incorporated into a group of more generic Item numbers. This has resulted in a lost opportunity to enhance the evidence surrounding health care delivery to these vulnerable populations. This paper recognises the importance of health policy in leading affirmative action to ensure these populations become visible in the implementation of the National Primary Health Care Strategy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Researcher 6 10%
Librarian 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 15 25%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Psychology 4 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 17 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2011.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Australian Journal of Primary Health
#372
of 627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,188
of 136,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Journal of Primary Health
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.