Title |
Suicide in Sri Lanka 1975–2012: age, period and cohort analysis of police and hospital data
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-839 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Duleeka W Knipe, Chris Metcalfe, Ravindra Fernando, Melissa Pearson, Flemming Konradsen, Michael Eddleston, David Gunnell |
Abstract |
Sri Lanka has experienced major changes in its suicide rates since the 1970s, and in 1995 it had one of the highest rates in the world. Subsequent reductions in Sri Lanka's suicide rates have been attributed to the introduction of restrictions on the availability of highly toxic pesticides. We investigate these changes in suicide rates in relation to age, gender, method specific trends and birth-cohort and period effects, with the aim of informing preventative strategies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sri Lanka | 5 | 28% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
Thailand | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 72% |
Scientists | 3 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 120 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
Researcher | 12 | 10% |
Professor | 8 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Other | 29 | 24% |
Unknown | 35 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 28% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
Psychology | 9 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 15 | 12% |
Unknown | 39 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,622,454
of 24,698,625 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,797
of 16,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,381
of 236,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#34
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,698,625 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.