| Title |
Correlates of use of different types of complementary and alternative medicine by breast cancer survivors in the nurses’ health study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10549-006-9239-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Catherine Buettner, Candyce H. Kroenke, Russell S. Phillips, Roger B. Davis, David M. Eisenberg, Michelle D. Holmes |
| Abstract |
Among breast cancer survivors, we identified the prevalence and correlates of use of different types of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 21% |
| Unknown | 27 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 24% |
| Psychology | 16 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2014.
All research outputs
#14,198,795
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#3,077
of 4,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,770
of 65,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#32
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.