↓ Skip to main content

Structural basis of fumarate hydratase deficiency

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Structural basis of fumarate hydratase deficiency
Published in
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10545-011-9294-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Picaud, Kathryn L. Kavanagh, Wyatt W. Yue, Wen Hwa Lee, Susanne Muller‐Knapp, Opher Gileadi, James Sacchettini, Udo Oppermann

Abstract

Fumarate hydratase catalyzes the stereospecific hydration across the olefinic double bond in fumarate leading to L-malate. The enzyme is expressed in mitochondrial and cytosolic compartments, and participates in the Krebs cycle in mitochondria, as well as in regulation of cytosolic fumarate levels. Fumarate hydratase deficiency is an autosomal recessive trait presenting as metabolic disorder with severe encephalopathy, seizures and poor neurological outcome. Heterozygous mutations are associated with a predisposition to cutaneous and uterine leiomyomas and to renal cancer. The crystal structure of human fumarate hydratase shows that mutations can be grouped into two distinct classes either affecting structural integrity of the core enzyme architecture, or are localized around the enzyme active site. An interactive version of this manuscript (which may contain additional mutations appended after acceptance of this manuscript) may be found on the SSIEM website at: http://www.ssiem.org/resources/structures/FH .

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Unknown 84 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Master 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Chemistry 5 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 23 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2017.
All research outputs
#2,086,694
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#69
of 1,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,293
of 108,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,831 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.