You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improvement in suicidal ideation after ketamine infusion: Relationship to reductions in depression and anxiety
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Psychiatric Research, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.07.027 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth D. Ballard, Dawn F. Ionescu, Jennifer L. Vande Voort, Mark J. Niciu, Erica M. Richards, David A. Luckenbaugh, Nancy E. Brutsché, Rezvan Ameli, Maura L. Furey, Carlos A. Zarate |
| Abstract |
Suicide is a psychiatric emergency. Currently, there are no approved pharmacologic treatments for suicidal ideation. Ketamine is an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist that rapidly reduces suicidal ideation as well as depression and anxiety, but the dynamic between these symptoms is not known. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate whether ketamine has an impact on suicidal thoughts, independent of depressive and anxiety symptoms. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Sweden | 1 | 9% |
| Argentina | 1 | 9% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 323 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 67 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 11% |
| Researcher | 32 | 10% |
| Other | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 57 | 17% |
| Unknown | 83 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 22% |
| Psychology | 43 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 34 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 45 | 14% |
| Unknown | 103 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#455,716
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychiatric Research
#97
of 3,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,994
of 245,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychiatric Research
#1
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,910 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.