↓ Skip to main content

Peduncular hallucinosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Peduncular hallucinosis
Published in
Journal of Neurology, September 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00415-0060-0254-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Benke

Abstract

Peduncular hallucinosis (PH) is a syndrome of hallucinations and brainstem symptoms which has only been described in single case reports. A detailed analysis of five patients was undertaken to investigate the clincial characteristics, hallucinations and behavioural abnormalities of PH in greater detail. Frequent clinical symptoms were oculomotor disturbances, impaired arousal, dysarthria and ataxia. In the chronic stage, sleep-wake cycle disturbances were common. Hallucinations were naturalistic, complex, scenic, mostly visual, but also combined visual-acoustic or visual-tactile and recurred stereotypically over months. Patients experienced their hallucinations as genuine and were unable to discriminate their percepts from reality. Neuropsychological testing disclosed severe impairments of episodic memory, occasionally coupled with confabulatory behaviour. By contrast, memory for hallucinations remained intact. Deficits of attentional and executive functions were found in a subgroup of patients. Associated abnormal behaviours were common, comprising confusion, delusional misidentification for persons and places, and loss of disease awareness. PH appeared after focal lesions in various regions, such as the midbrain, thalamus and pons. These findings document that subcortical, brainstem-related hallucinations are vivid, recurring percepts that have a strong naturalistic character and are often associated with cognitive and behavioural abnormalities. It seems likely that brainstem hallucinosis is caused by damage to ascending reticular systems and thalamocortical circuits. Available observations suggest that PH compromises cognitive functions which enable us to differentiate between illusionary percepts and reality, a reality monitoring system.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 71 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 11%
Other 7 9%
Other 22 29%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 40%
Neuroscience 12 16%
Psychology 10 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 12 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,445,297
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,763
of 4,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,517
of 67,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.