↓ Skip to main content

Stochastic Population Forecasting Based on Combinations of Expert Evaluations Within the Bayesian Paradigm

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Stochastic Population Forecasting Based on Combinations of Expert Evaluations Within the Bayesian Paradigm
Published in
Demography, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13524-014-0318-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco C. Billari, Rebecca Graziani, Eugenio Melilli

Abstract

This article suggests a procedure to derive stochastic population forecasts adopting an expert-based approach. As in previous work by Billari et al. (2012), experts are required to provide evaluations, in the form of conditional and unconditional scenarios, on summary indicators of the demographic components determining the population evolution: that is, fertility, mortality, and migration. Here, two main purposes are pursued. First, the demographic components are allowed to have some kind of dependence. Second, as a result of the existence of a body of shared information, possible correlations among experts are taken into account. In both cases, the dependence structure is not imposed by the researcher but rather is indirectly derived through the scenarios elicited from the experts. To address these issues, the method is based on a mixture model, within the so-called Supra-Bayesian approach, according to which expert evaluations are treated as data. The derived posterior distribution for the demographic indicators of interest is used as forecasting distribution, and a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm is designed to approximate this posterior. This article provides the questionnaire designed by the authors to collect expert opinions. Finally, an application to the forecast of the Italian population from 2010 to 2065 is proposed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 3%
Austria 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Professor 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Lecturer 4 10%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 28%
Mathematics 6 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 8%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2014.
All research outputs
#17,314,075
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#1,892
of 1,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,534
of 243,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#16
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.