Title |
High-dose inhaled terbutaline increases muscle strength and enhances maximal sprint performance in trained men
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00421-014-2970-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Morten Hostrup, Anders Kalsen, Jens Bangsbo, Peter Hemmersbach, Sebastian Karlsson, Vibeke Backer |
Abstract |
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of high-dose inhaled terbutaline on muscle strength, maximal sprinting, and time-trial performance in trained men. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 27% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Sweden | 1 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 15 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 62% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
Scientists | 4 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 4% |
Denmark | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 79 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
Researcher | 5 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 13% |
Unknown | 27 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 24% |
Sports and Recreations | 19 | 23% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 29 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2017.
All research outputs
#1,944,557
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#632
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,311
of 243,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#9
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.