↓ Skip to main content

Genotype–Phenotype Correlation — Promiscuity in the Era of Next-Generation Sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
104 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genotype–Phenotype Correlation — Promiscuity in the Era of Next-Generation Sequencing
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, August 2014
DOI 10.1056/nejmp1400788
Pubmed ID
Authors

James T. Lu, Philippe M. Campeau, Brendan H. Lee

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 8%
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 70 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 28%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 10%
Professor 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 5 6%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 10 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2015.
All research outputs
#677,996
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#7,799
of 32,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,297
of 247,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#96
of 280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.