↓ Skip to main content

Reducing sewer corrosion through integrated urban water management

Overview of attention for article published in Science, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
17 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
199 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reducing sewer corrosion through integrated urban water management
Published in
Science, August 2014
DOI 10.1126/science.1251418
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilje Pikaar, Keshab R Sharma, Shihu Hu, Wolfgang Gernjak, Jürg Keller, Zhiguo Yuan

Abstract

Sewer systems are among the most critical infrastructure assets for modern urban societies and provide essential human health protection. Sulfide-induced concrete sewer corrosion costs billions of dollars annually and has been identified as a main cause of global sewer deterioration. We performed a 2-year sampling campaign in South East Queensland (Australia), an extensive industry survey across Australia, and a comprehensive model-based scenario analysis of the various sources of sulfide. Aluminum sulfate addition during drinking water production contributes substantially to the sulfate load in sewage and indirectly serves as the primary source of sulfide. This unintended consequence of urban water management structures could be avoided by switching to sulfate-free coagulants, with no or only marginal additional expenses compared with the large potential savings in sewer corrosion costs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 214 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 18%
Student > Master 36 17%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Other 9 4%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 50 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 53 24%
Environmental Science 50 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Chemical Engineering 8 4%
Materials Science 4 2%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 64 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2019.
All research outputs
#380,238
of 24,077,033 outputs
Outputs from Science
#9,594
of 79,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,475
of 234,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#120
of 914 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,077,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 914 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.