| Title |
Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-011-0494-7 |
| Authors |
Daniele Fanelli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 8% |
| Japan | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Belgium | 2 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 32 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 64% |
| Scientists | 22 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,032 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 2% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| Brazil | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| Russia | 3 | <1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | <1% |
| Unknown | 981 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 187 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 145 | 14% |
| Researcher | 126 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 115 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 55 | 5% |
| Other | 213 | 21% |
| Unknown | 191 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 222 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 99 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 81 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 42 | 4% |
| Other | 263 | 25% |
| Unknown | 252 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 307. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2022.
All research outputs
#114,421
of 25,859,234 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#9
of 2,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#349
of 138,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,859,234 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.