↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive analysis of the chromatin landscape in Drosophila melanogaster

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
36 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
792 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1175 Mendeley
citeulike
27 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive analysis of the chromatin landscape in Drosophila melanogaster
Published in
Nature, December 2010
DOI 10.1038/nature09725
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter V. Kharchenko, Artyom A. Alekseyenko, Yuri B. Schwartz, Aki Minoda, Nicole C. Riddle, Jason Ernst, Peter J. Sabo, Erica Larschan, Andrey A. Gorchakov, Tingting Gu, Daniela Linder-Basso, Annette Plachetka, Gregory Shanower, Michael Y. Tolstorukov, Lovelace J. Luquette, Ruibin Xi, Youngsook L. Jung, Richard W. Park, Eric P. Bishop, Theresa K. Canfield, Richard Sandstrom, Robert E. Thurman, David M. MacAlpine, John A. Stamatoyannopoulos, Manolis Kellis, Sarah C. R. Elgin, Mitzi I. Kuroda, Vincenzo Pirrotta, Gary H. Karpen, Peter J. Park

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 46 4%
United Kingdom 14 1%
Spain 11 <1%
France 8 <1%
Germany 6 <1%
Japan 6 <1%
Sweden 3 <1%
Austria 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Other 31 3%
Unknown 1044 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 341 29%
Researcher 310 26%
Student > Master 93 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 77 7%
Student > Bachelor 69 6%
Other 175 15%
Unknown 110 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 676 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 251 21%
Computer Science 36 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 2%
Neuroscience 16 1%
Other 47 4%
Unknown 123 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,834,858
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#41,563
of 98,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,561
of 196,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#228
of 639 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 639 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.