↓ Skip to main content

Crying in Middle Childhood: A Report on Gender Differences

Overview of attention for article published in Sex Roles, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
55 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Crying in Middle Childhood: A Report on Gender Differences
Published in
Sex Roles, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11199-012-0136-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francine C. Jellesma, Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets

Abstract

The aims of this study were (1) to confirm gender differences in crying in middle childhood and (2) to identify factors that may explain why girls cry more than boys in a Dutch sample (North Holland and Utrecht). We examined 186 children's (age: 9-13 years) self-reports on crying, catharsis, seeking support for feelings, and internalizing feelings. Girls reported a greater crying frequency and crying proneness, and more emotional and physical catharsis after crying. In addition, they more frequently sought support for feelings and more often experienced sadness and somatic complaints than boys. Seeking help for negative feelings and the experience of sadness and somatic complaints were positively associated with crying frequency and crying proneness. Emotional catharsis was positively linked to crying proneness. Support was found for the potential mediating role of sadness and somatic complaints with respect to the gender difference in crying frequency and for the potential mediating role of emotional catharsis and somatic complaints for crying proneness. This study demonstrates that gender differences in crying frequency already exist in middle childhood and the findings suggest a linkage between these gender differences in crying and psychosocial factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Lecturer 4 8%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 40%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Computer Science 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#714,479
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Sex Roles
#204
of 2,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,236
of 169,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sex Roles
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,395 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.