↓ Skip to main content

Potassium channels in pancreatic duct epithelial cells: their role, function and pathophysiological relevance

Overview of attention for article published in Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Potassium channels in pancreatic duct epithelial cells: their role, function and pathophysiological relevance
Published in
Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00424-014-1585-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Viktória Venglovecz, Zoltán Rakonczay, Michael A. Gray, Péter Hegyi

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal epithelial cells play a fundamental role in HCO3 (-) secretion, a process which is essential for maintaining the integrity of the pancreas. Although several studies have implicated impaired HCO3 (-) and fluid secretion as a triggering factor in the development of pancreatitis, the mechanism and regulation of HCO3 (-) secretion is still not completely understood. To date, most studies on the ion transporters that orchestrate ductal HCO3 (-) secretion have focussed on the role of Cl(-)/HCO3 (-) exchangers and Cl(-) channels, whereas much less is known about the role of K(+) channels. However, there is growing evidence that many types of K(+) channels are present in ductal cells where they have an essential role in establishing and maintaining the electrochemical driving force for anion secretion. For this reason, strategies that increase K(+) channel function may help to restore impaired HCO3 (-) and fluid secretion, such as in pancreatitis, and therefore provide novel directions for future pancreatic therapy. In this review, our aims are to summarize the types of K(+) channels found in pancreatic ductal cells and to discuss their individual roles in ductal HCO3 (-) secretion. We will also describe how K(+) channels are involved in pathophysiological conditions and discuss how they could act as new molecular targets for the development of therapeutic approaches to treat pancreatic diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Chemistry 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2014.
All research outputs
#19,221,261
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#1,557
of 1,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,418
of 229,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#18
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,973 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.