| Title |
Does Screening for Pain Correspond to High Quality Care for Veterans?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-010-1301-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa Zubkoff, Karl A. Lorenz, Andy B. Lanto, Cathy D. Sherbourne, Joy R. Goebel, Peter A. Glassman, Lisa R. Shugarman, Lisa S. Meredith, Steven M. Asch |
| Abstract |
Routine numeric screening for pain is widely recommended, but its association with overall quality of pain care is unclear. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2014.
All research outputs
#4,768,656
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,956
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,058
of 96,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#26
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.