↓ Skip to main content

CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells are not required for mesenchymal stem cell function in fully MHC-mismatched mouse cardiac transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Cell and Tissue Research, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells are not required for mesenchymal stem cell function in fully MHC-mismatched mouse cardiac transplantation
Published in
Cell and Tissue Research, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00441-014-1956-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaofeng Jiang, Chen Liu, Jianpeng Hao, Dawei Guo, Jinshuai Guo, Junchao Yao, Kun Jiang, Zheming Cui, Lei Zhu, Wenyu Sun, Lin Lin, Jian Liang

Abstract

Although the immunomodulative properties of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) open up attractive possibilities in solid-organ transplantation, information concerning the optimal dose, route, timing of administration, major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-restriction and relevant mechanisms is currently lacking. Therefore, better characterization of MSC immunoregulatory activity and elucidation of its mechanisms are crucial. In this study, we confirmed that MSCs did not elicit proliferation by allogeneic CD4(+) T cells, suggesting that MSCs were not immunogenic. By using C57BL/6 mouse MSCs as donor-derived or recipient-derived or as third-party MSCs, we discovered that MSCs suppressed CD4(+) T cell proliferation and prolonged mouse cardiac allograft survival in a dose-dependent and non-MHC-restricted manner. We also found that intraperitoneal administration favored survival prolongation, although this prolongation was weaker than that via the intravenous route. Only infusion at earlier time points favored survival prolongation. Depletion of CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells did not affect the immunosuppression of MSCs on CD4(+) T cells. Moreover, MSCs did not induce regulatory T cells. The in vivo data revealed that MSCs did not increase the percentage of CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells and FoxP3 expression. More importantly, we demonstrated for the first time that depletion of CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells did not hinder MSC-induced survival prolongation, indicating that CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells were not essential for the prolongation of MSC-mediated allograft survival.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Librarian 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Psychology 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2014.
All research outputs
#13,711,256
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#1,280
of 2,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,744
of 232,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.