↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Gender and Psychosocial Factors on “Friends with Benefits” Relationships Among Young Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Gender and Psychosocial Factors on “Friends with Benefits” Relationships Among Young Adults
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10508-010-9611-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesse Owen, Frank D. Fincham

Abstract

Friends with benefits relationships (FWB) are a blend of friendship and physical intimacy outside of a committed romantic relationship. This study examined young adults' (n = 889) engagement in, and reactions to, a FWB relationship in the past year based on their gender, psychological distress, alcohol use, and relationship attitudes. Men (54.3%) were more likely than women (42.9%) to report at least one FWB relationship and both men and women reported that FWB relationships were associated with more positive emotional reactions than negative ones although this difference was larger for men. Greater alcohol use was related to engaging in a FWB relationship and this relationship was stronger for women. Further, thoughtfulness about relationship decisions moderated the relationship between alcohol use and engaging in FWB relationships, and again this moderation effect was stronger for women than men. Young adults with more psychological distress and who felt constrained in the FWB relationship were more likely to report negative emotional reactions. Implications for psychoeducational programs and future research are offered.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 128 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 16%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Researcher 7 5%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 65 49%
Social Sciences 18 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 32 24%