You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Management and Diagnosis of Psychogenic Cough, Habit Cough, and Tic Cough A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CHEST, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1378/chest.14-0795 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qusay Haydour, Fares Alahdab, Magdoleen Farah, Patricia Barrionuevo, Anne E. Vertigan, Peter A. Newcombe, Tamara Pringsheim, Anne B. Chang, Bruce K. Rubin, Lorcan McGarvey, Kelly A. Weir, Kenneth W. Altman, Anthony Feinstein, Mohammad Hassan Murad, Richard S. Irwin |
| Abstract |
Several pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapeutic options have been used to treat cough that is not associated with a pulmonary or extrapulmonary etiology. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Romania | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 22% |
| Unknown | 29 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 33% |
| Psychology | 12 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,570,261
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#2,248
of 13,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,087
of 240,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#22
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.