↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Location, Depth, Quality, and Intensity of Experimentally Induced Pain in 6 Low Back Muscles

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical journal of pain, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Location, Depth, Quality, and Intensity of Experimentally Induced Pain in 6 Low Back Muscles
Published in
Clinical journal of pain, September 2014
DOI 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kylie J. Tucker, Matthew Fels, Scott R. Walker, Paul W. Hodges

Abstract

The pattern of pain originating from experimentally induced low back pain appears diffuse. This may be because sensory information from low back muscles converges, sensory innervation extends over multiple vertebral levels, or people have difficulty accurately representing the painful location on standardized pain maps.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 16%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 43%
Psychology 3 7%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2015.
All research outputs
#16,720,137
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical journal of pain
#1,430
of 2,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,665
of 248,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical journal of pain
#20
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.