↓ Skip to main content

Improved measures for the cross-national comparison of age profiles of internal migration

Overview of attention for article published in Population Studies, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improved measures for the cross-national comparison of age profiles of internal migration
Published in
Population Studies, April 2014
DOI 10.1080/00324728.2014.890243
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aude Bernard, Martin Bell, Elin Charles-Edwards

Abstract

We develop and demonstrate the application of a concise set of measures intended to encapsulate key features of the age profile of internal migration and highlight the significant differences that exist between nations in these profiles. Model schedules have been the most common method of comparing internal migration patterns but issues related to the estimation and interpretation of their parameters hinder their use for cross-national comparison. We demonstrate that the interpretation of exponential coefficients as rates of ascent and descent does not best reflect the slopes of migration age profiles, and we propose more consistent measures based on the rate of change in migration intensity. We demonstrate, through correlation and factor analysis, that most of the inter-country variance in migration age profiles is captured by the age at and intensity of peak migration. The application of these two indicators to 25 countries reveals significant differences between regions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 2 7%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Researcher 6 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 47%
Arts and Humanities 3 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 7%
Mathematics 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,950,758
of 24,230,934 outputs
Outputs from Population Studies
#328
of 797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,660
of 231,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Studies
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,230,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.