↓ Skip to main content

How will coral reef fish communities respond to climate-driven disturbances? Insight from landscape-scale perturbations

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
How will coral reef fish communities respond to climate-driven disturbances? Insight from landscape-scale perturbations
Published in
Oecologia, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00442-014-3011-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas C. Adam, Andrew J. Brooks, Sally J. Holbrook, Russell J. Schmitt, Libe Washburn, Giacomo Bernardi

Abstract

Global climate change is rapidly altering disturbance regimes in many ecosystems including coral reefs, yet the long-term impacts of these changes on ecosystem structure and function are difficult to predict. A major ecosystem service provided by coral reefs is the provisioning of physical habitat for other organisms, and consequently, many of the effects of climate change on coral reefs will be mediated by their impacts on habitat structure. Therefore, there is an urgent need to understand the independent and combined effects of coral mortality and loss of physical habitat on reef-associated biota. Here, we use a unique series of events affecting the coral reefs around the Pacific island of Moorea, French Polynesia to differentiate between the impacts of coral mortality and the degradation of physical habitat on the structure of reef fish communities. We found that, by removing large amounts of physical habitat, a tropical cyclone had larger impacts on reef fish communities than an outbreak of coral-eating sea stars that caused widespread coral mortality but left the physical structure intact. In addition, the impacts of declining structural complexity on reef fish assemblages accelerated as structure became increasingly rare. Structure provided by dead coral colonies can take up to decades to erode following coral mortality, and, consequently, our results suggest that predictions based on short-term studies are likely to grossly underestimate the long-term impacts of coral decline on reef fish communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 1%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 149 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 19%
Student > Master 29 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Other 11 7%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 35 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 38%
Environmental Science 40 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Mathematics 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 40 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2018.
All research outputs
#2,693,879
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#490
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,264
of 228,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#5
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.