↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin D supplementation for treatment of seasonal affective symptoms in healthcare professionals: a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 4,525)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin D supplementation for treatment of seasonal affective symptoms in healthcare professionals: a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial
Published in
BMC Research Notes, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-7-528
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tenna Bloch Frandsen, Manan Pareek, Jens Peter Hansen, Connie Thuroee Nielsen

Abstract

Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (25(OH)D) have been associated with a higher likelihood of seasonal affective disorder (SAD) and poor mental well-being, yet firm evidence for either remains lacking. Thus, vitamin D supplementation may alleviate symptoms associated with SAD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 169 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 20%
Student > Master 32 19%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 4%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 45 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 13%
Psychology 14 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 51 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#373,341
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#28
of 4,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,206
of 244,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#3
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.