↓ Skip to main content

Do Boreal Forests Need Fire Disturbance to Maintain Productivity?

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Do Boreal Forests Need Fire Disturbance to Maintain Productivity?
Published in
Ecosystems, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10021-014-9782-4
Authors

Charles Ward, David Pothier, David Paré

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 69 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 24%
Student > Master 14 19%
Researcher 10 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 25 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Engineering 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 20 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#658
of 1,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,042
of 246,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#12
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.