↓ Skip to main content

The identification of threshold concepts: a review of theoretical complexities and methodological challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Higher Education, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The identification of threshold concepts: a review of theoretical complexities and methodological challenges
Published in
Higher Education, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10734-012-9542-3
Authors

Sarah Barradell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 220 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 18%
Lecturer 39 17%
Researcher 18 8%
Other 17 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 16 7%
Other 63 28%
Unknown 34 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 65 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 13%
Engineering 16 7%
Arts and Humanities 15 7%
Computer Science 14 6%
Other 59 26%
Unknown 29 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2017.
All research outputs
#13,716,141
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Higher Education
#1,048
of 1,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,330
of 166,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Higher Education
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.