↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial diversity in snow on North Pole ice floes

Overview of attention for article published in Extremophiles, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Bacterial diversity in snow on North Pole ice floes
Published in
Extremophiles, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00792-014-0660-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aviaja L. Hauptmann, Marek Stibal, Jacob Bælum, Thomas Sicheritz-Pontén, Søren Brunak, Jeff S. Bowman, Lars H. Hansen, Carsten S. Jacobsen, Nikolaj Blom

Abstract

The microbial abundance and diversity in snow on ice floes at three sites near the North Pole was assessed using quantitative PCR and 454 pyrosequencing. Abundance of 16S rRNA genes in the samples ranged between 43 and 248 gene copies per millilitre of melted snow. A total of 291,331 sequences were obtained through 454 pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes, resulting in 984 OTUs at 97 % identity. Two sites were dominated by Cyanobacteria (72 and 61 %, respectively), including chloroplasts. The third site differed by consisting of 95 % Proteobacteria. Principal component analysis showed that the three sites clustered together when compared to the underlying environments of sea ice and ocean water. The Shannon indices ranged from 2.226 to 3.758, and the Chao1 indices showed species richness between 293 and 353 for the three samples. The relatively low abundances and diversity found in the samples indicate a lower rate of microbial input to this snow habitat compared to snow in the proximity of terrestrial and anthropogenic sources of microorganisms. The differences in species composition and diversity between the sites show that apparently similar snow habitats contain a large variation in biodiversity, although the differences were smaller than the differences to the underlying environment. The results support the idea that a globally distributed community exists in snow and that the global snow community can in part be attributed to microbial input from the atmosphere.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Puerto Rico 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 62 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 32%
Environmental Science 11 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,115,295
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Extremophiles
#206
of 815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,583
of 233,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Extremophiles
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 815 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.