↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of toxicity in C9FTLD/ALS

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
Title
Mechanisms of toxicity in C9FTLD/ALS
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00401-013-1237-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tania F. Gendron, Veronique V. Belzil, Yong-Jie Zhang, Leonard Petrucelli

Abstract

A hexanucleotide repeat expansion within a non-coding region of the C9ORF72 gene is the most common mutation causative of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Elucidating how this bidirectionally transcribed G4C2·C4G2 expanded repeat causes "C9FTLD/ALS" has since become an important goal of the field. Likely pathogenic mechanisms include toxicity induced by repeat-containing RNAs, and loss of C9orf72 function due to epigenetic changes resulting in decreased C9ORF72 mRNA expression. With regards to the former, sense and antisense transcripts of the expanded repeat aberrantly interact with various RNA-binding proteins and form discrete nuclear structures, termed RNA foci. These foci have the capacity to sequester select RNA-binding proteins, thereby impairing their function. (G4C2)exp and (C4G2)exp transcripts also succumb to an alternative fate: repeat-associated non-ATG (RAN) translation. This unconventional mode of translation, which occurs in the absence of an initiating codon, results in the abnormal production of poly(GA), poly(GP), poly(GR), poly(PR) and poly(PA) peptides, collectively referred to as C9RAN proteins. C9RAN proteins form neuronal inclusions throughout the central nervous system of C9FTLD/ALS patients and may contribute to disease pathogenesis. This review aims to summarize the important findings from studies examining mechanisms of disease in C9FTLD/ALS, and will also highlight some of the many questions in need of further investigation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 3 1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 204 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 25%
Student > Bachelor 39 18%
Student > Master 28 13%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 9%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 31 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 25%
Neuroscience 40 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 17%
Chemistry 6 3%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 34 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2015.
All research outputs
#3,227,150
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#844
of 2,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,715
of 304,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#13
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.