↓ Skip to main content

Oral glucocorticoid use is associated with an increased risk of fracture

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
217 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Oral glucocorticoid use is associated with an increased risk of fracture
Published in
Osteoporosis International, February 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00198-003-1548-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Steinbuch, Thomas E. Youket, Stanley Cohen

Abstract

Oral glucocorticoids (GCs) are widely used and despite their adverse effects on bone mineral density, the risk of sustaining osteoporotic fractures is not well addressed. The objective of this retrospective, cohort study was to assess fracture risk in patients exposed to oral GCs. Patients from an administrative claims database who were prescribed oral GCs and were enrolled 1 year before and 1 year after the initial oral GC claim were matched with a comparison population on age, sex, and date of first claim. Measurements of exposure included amount, duration, and pattern of oral GC use. The osteoporosis-related risk of fracture was based on the ratio of hazard functions estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model. The adjusted relative risk (RR) estimates (and 95% CI) for fractures were hip 1.87 (95% CI, 1.2 to 2.9), vertebral 2.92 (95% CI, 2.0 to 4.3), wrist/forearm 1.03 (95% CI, 0.8 to 1.4), nonvertebral 1.68 (95% CI, 1.5 to 1.9), any fracture 1.75 (95% CI, 1.6 to 1.9). A dose dependence of fracture risk was observed for hip, vertebral, nonvertebral, and any fractures. Long duration and continuous pattern of GC use demonstrated a significant 5-fold increased risk of hip and 5.9-fold increased risk of vertebral fracture. The combined effect of higher dose, longer duration, and continuous pattern further increased RR estimates to 7-fold for hip and 17-fold for vertebral fractures. This study confirms previous observations that suggest oral GCs have a rapid deleterious effect on trabecular-rich bone. The emerging relationship between amount, duration, and pattern of oral GC exposure and fracture risk should be considered in clinical practice and managed care settings to avoid the debilitating effects of fractures in patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Ukraine 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 20%
Other 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 19 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#3,195
of 3,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,648
of 146,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#14
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.