↓ Skip to main content

A bottom-up re-estimation of global fisheries subsidies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bioeconomics, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 128)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
6 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
237 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
342 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A bottom-up re-estimation of global fisheries subsidies
Published in
Journal of Bioeconomics, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10818-010-9091-8
Authors

U. Rashid Sumaila, Ahmed S. Khan, Andrew J. Dyck, Reg Watson, Gordon Munro, Peter Tydemers, Daniel Pauly

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 10 3%
Unknown 317 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 20%
Researcher 66 19%
Student > Master 61 18%
Student > Bachelor 29 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 4%
Other 50 15%
Unknown 54 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 100 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 24%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 32 9%
Social Sciences 31 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 3%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 62 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,839,888
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioeconomics
#15
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,215
of 104,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioeconomics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.