| Title |
Patients’ preferences: a discrete-choice experiment for treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10198-014-0622-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Axel C. Mühlbacher, Susanne Bethge |
| Abstract |
Lung cancer is a major cause of cancer-related deaths and thus represents a global health problem. According to World Health Organization (WHO) estimates, approximately 1.37 million people die each year from lung cancer. Different therapeutic approaches as well as several treatment options exist. To date decisions on which therapies to use have largely been made by clinical experts. Comparative preference studies show that underlying weighting of treatment goals by experts is not necessarily congruent with the preferences of affected patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 17% |
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 33 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 9% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#919
of 1,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,987
of 247,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.