| Title |
A Systematic Review of Preclinical Studies on the Therapeutic Potential of Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-Derived Microvesicles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12015-014-9545-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Celine Akyurekli, Yevgeniya Le, Richard B. Richardson, Dean Fergusson, Jason Tay, David S. Allan |
| Abstract |
The therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) may be largely mediated by paracrine factors contained in microvesicles (MV) released from intracellular endosomes. A systematic review of controlled interventional animal studies was performed to identify models of organ injury where clinical translation of MSC-derived microvesicle therapy appears most promising as regenerative therapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 279 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 52 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 53 | 19% |
| Unknown | 51 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 55 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 14 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Unknown | 63 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,228,347
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#147
of 1,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,515
of 241,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.