You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stoichiometric patterns in foliar nutrient resorption across multiple scales
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New Phytologist, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04249.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sasha C Reed, Alan R Townsend, Eric A Davidson, Cory C Cleveland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 209 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 52 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 89 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 51 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 53 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2021.
All research outputs
#14,723,813
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from New Phytologist
#7,571
of 9,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,758
of 186,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Phytologist
#43
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.