| Title |
Age difference in efficiency of locomotion and maximal power output in well-trained triathletes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-014-2977-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeanick Brisswalter, Sam S. X. Wu, Frederic Sultana, Thierry Bernard, Chris R. Abbiss |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to examine the influence of age on cycling efficiency and sprint power output in well-trained endurance masters athletes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Italy | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 39 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 30% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 17 | 43% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2015.
All research outputs
#3,379,851
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,013
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,000
of 243,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#15
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.