↓ Skip to main content

The influence of cold water immersions on adaptation following a single bout of damaging exercise

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
Title
The influence of cold water immersions on adaptation following a single bout of damaging exercise
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00421-008-0941-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Glyn Howatson, S. Goodall, K. A. van Someren

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to elucidate the effects of cold water immersions (CWIs) following damaging exercise on the repeated bout effect (RBE). Sixteen males performed two bouts of drop jump exercise separated by 14-21 days. Participants were equally, but randomly assigned to either a CWI (12-min CWI at 15 degrees C) or control group (12-min seated rest). Treatments were given immediately after the first exercise bout, 24, 48 and 72 h post-exercise. No interventions were given following the second bout. Maximum voluntary contraction (MIVC), soreness (DOMS), creatine kinase (CK), thigh girth and range of motion (ROM) were recorded before and for 96 h following the initial and repeated bouts of damaging exercise. All variables, except ROM, showed a significant time effect (P < 0.01) indicating the presence of muscle damage following the initial bout; there were no differences between the CWI and control groups after the initial bout. Following the repeated bout of exercise there was a significant attenuation in the reduction of MIVC (P = 0.002) and a reduction in DOMS (P < 0.001), which is indicative of the RBE. There were no significant differences between groups following the repeated bout of damaging exercise. These data show that CWI had no effect following damaging exercise and did not inhibit the RBE. Despite CWI being used routinely, its efficacy remains unclear and there is a need to elucidate the benefits of this intervention on recovery and adaptation to provide practitioners with evidence based practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 224 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 21%
Student > Bachelor 47 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Researcher 14 6%
Other 41 18%
Unknown 41 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 92 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 9%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 50 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,760,001
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,292
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,609
of 178,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.