You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
International Study on Microcirculatory Shock Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients*
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care Medicine, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1097/ccm.0000000000000553 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Namkje A. R. Vellinga, E. Christiaan Boerma, Matty Koopmans, Abele Donati, Arnaldo Dubin, Nathan I. Shapiro, Rupert M. Pearse, Flavia R. Machado, Michael Fries, Tulin Akarsu-Ayazoglu, Andrius Pranskunas, Steven Hollenberg, Gianmarco Balestra, Mat van Iterson, Peter H. J. van der Voort, Farid Sadaka, Gary Minto, Ulku Aypar, F. Javier Hurtado, Giampaolo Martinelli, Didier Payen, Frank van Haren, Anthony Holley, Rajyabardhan Pattnaik, Hernando Gomez, Ravindra L. Mehta, Alejandro H. Rodriguez, Carolina Ruiz, Héctor S. Canales, Jacques Duranteau, Peter E. Spronk, Shaman Jhanji, Sheena Hubble, Marialuisa Chierego, Christian Jung, Daniel Martin, Carlo Sorbara, Jan G. P. Tijssen, Jan Bakker, Can Ince |
| Abstract |
Microcirculatory alterations are associated with adverse outcome in subsets of critically ill patients. The prevalence and significance of microcirculatory alterations in the general ICU population are unknown. We studied the prevalence of microcirculatory alterations in a heterogeneous ICU population and its predictive value in an integrative model of macro- and microcirculatory variables. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 30% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Greece | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 183 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 11% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 48 | 26% |
| Unknown | 36 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 112 | 60% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 43 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2014.
All research outputs
#6,212,618
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#3,737
of 9,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,855
of 359,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#64
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.