| Title |
How do patients with severe mental diagnosis cope in everyday life - a qualitative study comparing patients’ experiences of self-referral inpatient treatment with treatment as usual?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-347 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marit B Rise, Gretha H Evensen, Inger Elise O Moljord, Marit Rø, Dagfinn Bjørgen, Lasse Eriksen |
| Abstract |
Several hospitals in Norway provide short self-referral inpatient treatment to patients with severe mental diagnosis. No studies have compared the experiences of patients who have had the opportunity to self-refer to inpatient treatment with patients who have received treatment as usual. This qualitative study was nested within a randomised controlled trial investigating the effect of self-referral to inpatient treatment. The aim was to explore how patients with severe mental diagnosis coped four months after signing a contract for self-referral, as compared to patients receiving treatment as usual. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Norway | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 13 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2016.
All research outputs
#13,859,387
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,688
of 7,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,165
of 233,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#77
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.