↓ Skip to main content

Neoplastic fever: a neglected paraneoplastic syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
Neoplastic fever: a neglected paraneoplastic syndrome
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, April 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00520-005-0825-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason A. Zell, Jae C. Chang

Abstract

Neoplastic fever, a paraneoplastic syndrome caused by cancer itself, represents a diagnostic challenge for the clinician and is an important issue in supportive oncology. Timely recognition of this febrile condition by differentiating it from other cancer-associated fevers, such as infection and drug reaction, is essential for effective patient management. Although the pathophysiology of neoplastic fever is not well understood, it is suspected to be cytokine mediated. In clinical practice, when a patient with cancer presents with unexplained fever, extensive diagnostic studies are needed to differentiate neoplastic fever from nonneoplastic fever. Only after excluding identifiable etiologies of fever can the diagnosis of neoplastic fever be suspected. According to our experience, the naproxen test is a safe and useful test in differentiating neoplastic fever from infectious fever in patients with cancer. In addition, naproxen and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been effective in the management of neoplastic fever and offer a significant palliative benefit for the patient.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 110 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 25 22%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 22 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 63%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Unspecified 3 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 26 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,542,817
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#467
of 4,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,793
of 57,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.