↓ Skip to main content

Thoracic pedicle classification determined by inner cortical width of pedicles on computed tomography images: its clinical significance for posterior vertebral column resection to treat rigid and…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Thoracic pedicle classification determined by inner cortical width of pedicles on computed tomography images: its clinical significance for posterior vertebral column resection to treat rigid and severe spinal deformities—a retrospective review of cases
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-278
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying Zhang, Jingming Xie, Yingsong Wang, Ni Bi, Zhi Zhao, Tao Li

Abstract

Posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) is an effective alternative for treating rigid and severe spinal deformities. Accurate placement of pedicle screws, especially apically, is crucial. As morphologic evaluations of thoracic pedicles have not provided objective criteria, we propose a thoracic pedicle classification for treating rigid and severe spinal deformities.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2014.
All research outputs
#20,234,388
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,616
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,296
of 231,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#94
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.