↓ Skip to main content

Thyroid Function and Serum Copper, Selenium, and Zinc in General U.S. Population

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Trace Element Research, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Thyroid Function and Serum Copper, Selenium, and Zinc in General U.S. Population
Published in
Biological Trace Element Research, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12011-014-9992-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ram B. Jain

Abstract

Association of the levels of serum selenium (Se), zinc (Zn), and copper (Cu) with thyroid function was assessed by analyzing data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for the cycle 2011-2012. Thyroid function variables analyzed were as follows: thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free and total triiodothyronine (FT3, TT3), free and total thyroxine (FT4, TT4), and thyroglobulin (TGN). Regression models with log-transformed values of thyroid hormones as independent variables and age, race/ethnicity, smoking and iodine sufficiency status, respondents' education, and levels of Se, Zn, and Cu as dependent variables were fitted. For males, levels of Zn were associated with decreased levels of FT4 and TT4, and levels of Cu were associated with increased levels of FT4 and TT4. For females, levels of Cu were associated with increased levels of TT3 and TT4. Smoking was found to be associated with lower levels of TSH and higher levels of TGN in males. Smoking was found to be associated with lower levels of TT4 in females. Males had about 5-10% higher levels of both Se and Zn, but as much as 20% lower levels of Cu than females. Smoking was associated with lower levels of Zn, but higher levels of Cu in males.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 15 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,764,374
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Biological Trace Element Research
#80
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,029
of 227,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Trace Element Research
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.