↓ Skip to main content

Ion Channels in Microbes

Overview of attention for article published in Physiological Reviews, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
patent
9 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
177 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
322 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ion Channels in Microbes
Published in
Physiological Reviews, October 2008
DOI 10.1152/physrev.00005.2008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Boris Martinac, Yoshiro Saimi, Ching Kung

Abstract

Studies of ion channels have for long been dominated by the animalcentric, if not anthropocentric, view of physiology. The structures and activities of ion channels had, however, evolved long before the appearance of complex multicellular organisms on earth. The diversity of ion channels existing in cellular membranes of prokaryotes is a good example. Although at first it may appear as a paradox that most of what we know about the structure of eukaryotic ion channels is based on the structure of bacterial channels, this should not be surprising given the evolutionary relatedness of all living organisms and suitability of microbial cells for structural studies of biological macromolecules in a laboratory environment. Genome sequences of the human as well as various microbial, plant, and animal organisms unambiguously established the evolutionary links, whereas crystallographic studies of the structures of major types of ion channels published over the last decade clearly demonstrated the advantage of using microbes as experimental organisms. The purpose of this review is not only to provide an account of acquired knowledge on microbial ion channels but also to show that the study of microbes and their ion channels may also hold a key to solving unresolved molecular mysteries in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 303 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 87 27%
Researcher 69 21%
Student > Master 34 11%
Student > Bachelor 27 8%
Professor 21 7%
Other 56 17%
Unknown 28 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 130 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 14%
Chemistry 24 7%
Physics and Astronomy 18 6%
Neuroscience 15 5%
Other 52 16%
Unknown 39 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,268,296
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Physiological Reviews
#158
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,016
of 89,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physiological Reviews
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.