You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interactions between two naturalised invasive predators in Australia: are feral cats suppressed by dingoes?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-014-0767-1 |
| Authors |
Benjamin L. Allen, Lee R. Allen, Luke K.-P. Leung |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 50% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 13% |
| Botswana | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 25 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2014.
All research outputs
#2,416,969
of 23,393,513 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#376
of 2,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,605
of 236,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,393,513 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.