| Title |
Would it be too late? A retrospective case–control analysis to evaluate maternal–fetal outcomes in advanced maternal age
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00404-014-3367-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leonarda Ciancimino, Antonio Simone Laganà, Benito Chiofalo, Roberta Granese, Roberta Grasso, Onofrio Triolo |
| Abstract |
To evaluate maternal-fetal outcomes in women of advanced maternal age (AMA; >35 years old) and women of physiological maternal age as controls (C; <35 years old). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,108,102
of 24,063,285 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#144
of 2,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,694
of 231,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#4
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,063,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.