↓ Skip to main content

Quetiapine overdose: predicting intubation, duration of ventilation, cardiac monitoring and the effect of activated charcoal

Overview of attention for article published in International Clinical Psychopharmacology, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quetiapine overdose: predicting intubation, duration of ventilation, cardiac monitoring and the effect of activated charcoal
Published in
International Clinical Psychopharmacology, July 2009
DOI 10.1097/yic.0b013e32832bb078
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geoffrey K Isbister, Stephen B Duffull

Abstract

To investigate factors that predict the probability and duration of mechanical ventilation in quetiapine overdose, and if cardiac toxicity occurs, this cohort study involved 176 patients presenting to a toxicology unit on 286 occasions with quetiapine overdose. Patient demographics, dose, coingestants, single dose activated charcoal (SDAC) administration, requirement for and duration of mechanical ventilation and electrocardiogram parameters (heart rate, QT, QRS) were obtained. A fully Bayesian approach using logistic regression and time-to-event analysis was undertaken to investigate the relationship between predictor variables and the requirement for and duration of intubation. QT versus heart rate was plotted on a QT nomogram to investigate QT prolongation. The commonest clinical effects were central nervous system depression on 136 occasions (48%) and tachycardia (67%). There were no malignant arrhythmias and an abnormal QT occurred in only 24 admissions (8.4%), all with tachycardia. Hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) occurred on 35 occasions (12%). The logistic regression model supported dose and SDAC (<2 h) influencing the probability of intubation, but not age, sex, therapeutic use of quetiapine or coingestants. The probability of intubation was 10% after 2 g, 22% after 5 g, 37% after 10 g and 55% after 20 g and SDAC resulted in a reduced probability of intubation of 7% for 2 g ingestion. The median duration of ventilation was 22 h (interquartile: 19-28 h), which was not affected by SDAC. Ingested dose can inform early decision making about requirements for intensive care unit admission and intubation. SDAC seems to have only modest effects on outcomes but may be considered within 2 h for large ingestions. Electrocardiogram monitoring is unlikely to be necessary.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 14 20%
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 48%
Psychology 8 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Clinical Psychopharmacology
#688
of 951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,404
of 122,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Clinical Psychopharmacology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.