Title |
Practice guidelines in the context of primary care, learning and usability in the physicians’ decision-making process – a qualitative study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Primary Care, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-15-141 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maria Ingemansson, Pia Bastholm-Rahmner, Anna Kiessling |
Abstract |
Decision-making is central for general practitioners (GP). Practice guidelines are important tools in this process but implementation of them in the complex context of primary care is a challenge. The purpose of this study was to explore how GPs approach, learn from and use practice guidelines in their day-to-day decision-making process in primary care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 83 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 22% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
Researcher | 7 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
Other | 26 | 30% |
Unknown | 15 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
Psychology | 4 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 19 | 22% |
Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2014.
All research outputs
#8,185,440
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,068
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,603
of 246,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#11
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.