↓ Skip to main content

Antimicrobial stewardship and linezolid

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Antimicrobial stewardship and linezolid
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11096-014-9995-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pauline Guillard, Arnaud de La Blanchardière, Vincent Cattoir, Marc-Olivier Fischer, Renaud Verdon, Guillaume Saint-Lorant

Abstract

Background Since 2002, linezolid, the first representative of the oxazolidinone class, has been widely prescribed, sometimes outside of approved indications. However, several cases of clinical outbreaks due to linezolid-resistant organisms have been reported, and its relatively high cost represents an economic challenge for hospital settings. Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the impact of different actions conducted by an antimicrobial stewardship team (AST) to control over-prescription of linezolid with regard to the defined daily dose (DDD) per 1,000 inhabitants per day. Setting This work was conducted in a 1,495-bed hospital from 2009 to 2013. An AST, gathering the departments of pharmacy, microbiology, and infectious diseases, assessed the pertinence of linezolid use and associated effect on the prescriber. Method A retrospective study was conducted throughout 2009. Three different evaluations were prospectively carried out, each for 3 months, between 2011 and 2013. Main outcome measure The indicators chosen to monitor the consumption of linezolid were the DDD per 1,000 inhabitants per day, which enabled a comparison to be made between hospitals from 2004 to 2012, and of the pertinence of its prescription by different departments. Results From 2009 to 2013, 239 patients were evaluated through three 3-month stages. Prescriptions were for off-label use in 45 % of cases. Prescriptions were considered appropriate in 60 % of cases. Unsuitable treatment was either modified or discontinued (62 and 38 % of cases, respectively). Mean duration of linezolid treatment was 8 days, i.e. below the national mean duration reported in the literature. To highlight the impact of action taken by the team, a consensual strategy to treat ventilator-acquired pneumonia was elaborated with principal prescribers. Throughout the study, the mean DDD per 1,000 inhabitants per day increased very slowly and was lower than the eleven other French hospitals, which were secondarily included in this study. Conclusion The multidisciplinary approach that was adopted for therapeutic education and delivery control led to an improvement in the proper use of linezolid. Similar strategy should be extended to other antimicrobial agents, such as carbapenems, for which both cost and risk of resistance emergence are of major concern.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Postgraduate 6 12%
Other 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 15 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2014.
All research outputs
#13,716,141
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#653
of 1,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,529
of 235,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#15
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.