↓ Skip to main content

Screening Carbohydrate Libraries for Protein Interactions Using the Direct ESI-MS Assay. Applications to Libraries of Unknown Concentration

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Screening Carbohydrate Libraries for Protein Interactions Using the Direct ESI-MS Assay. Applications to Libraries of Unknown Concentration
Published in
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13361-014-0964-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena N. Kitova, Amr El-Hawiet, John S. Klassen

Abstract

A semiquantitative electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) binding assay suitable for analyzing mixtures of oligosaccharides, at unknown concentrations, for interactions with target proteins is described. The assay relies on the differences in the ratio of the relative abundances of the ligand-bound and free protein ions measured by ESI-MS at two or more initial protein concentrations to distinguish low affinity (≤10(3) M(-1)) ligands from moderate and high affinity (>10(5) M(-1)) ligands present in the library and to rank their affinities. Control experiments were performed on solutions of a single chain antibody and a mixture of synthetic oligosaccharides, with known affinities, in the absence and presence of a 40-component carbohydrate library to demonstrate the implementation and reliability of the assay. The application of the assay for screening natural libraries of carbohydrates against proteins is also demonstrated using mixtures of human milk oligosaccharides, isolated from breast milk, and fragments of a bacterial toxin and human galectin 3.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 37%
Researcher 5 26%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 10 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%