| Title |
The effect of RAD51 135 G>C and XRCC2 G>A (rs3218536) polymorphisms on ovarian cancer risk among Caucasians: a meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tumor Biology, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13277-014-1769-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shujing Shi, Lingyan Qin, Mengqiu Tian, Mao Xie, Xiaoxue Li, Chenglin Qi, Xiang Yi |
| Abstract |
Genetic polymorphisms of RAD51 135 G>C and XRCC2 G>A (rs3218536) have been reported to change the risk of ovarian cancer, but the results are controversial. To get a more precise result, a meta-analysis was performed. A comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure was carried out to get case-control studies published up to November 2013. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and its corresponding 95 % confidence interval (CI) were conducted to estimate the effect of RAD51 135 G>C and XRCC2 G>A (rs3218536) polymorphisms on ovarian cancer risk. A total of 13 independent case-control studies with 5,927 cases and 10,303 controls were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant association between RAD51 135 G>C polymorphism and risk of ovarian cancer. However, the result of total studies indicated the XRCC2 G>A (rs3218536) polymorphism could reduce the risk of ovarian cancer (heterozygote model AG vs. GG: OR=0.877, 95 % CI=0.770-0.999, P=0.048; dominant model AA/AG vs. GG: OR=0.864, 95 % CI=0.763-0.979, P=0.022). The result was still significant after Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium-violating studies were excluded (allele contrast A vs. G: OR=0.836, 95 % CI=0.74-0.943, P=0.004; homozygote model AA vs. GG: OR=0.562, 95 % CI=0.317-0.994, P=0.048; heterozygote model AG vs. GG: OR=0.859, 95 % CI=0.753-0.98, P=0.023; dominant model AA/AG vs. GG: OR=0.842, 95 % CI=0.74-0.958, P=0.009). In the stratified analysis by ethnicity, significantly reduced risk was observed among Caucasians in dominant model (AA/AG vs. GG: OR=0.867, 95 % CI=0.764-0.984, P=0.027). No significant association was found between the RAD51 135G>C polymorphism and the risk of ovarian cancer. Interestingly, XRCC2 G>A (rs3218536) polymorphism might reduce the risk of ovarian cancer. Larger-scale and well-designed studies are needed to further clarify the association. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2014.
All research outputs
#20,234,388
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,834
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,932
of 221,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#43
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.