↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for Transmission of Bluetongue Virus Serotype 26 through Direct Contact

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence for Transmission of Bluetongue Virus Serotype 26 through Direct Contact
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0096049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carrie Batten, Karin Darpel, Mark Henstock, Petra Fay, Eva Veronesi, Simon Gubbins, Samantha Graves, Lorraine Frost, Christopher Oura

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 21%
Student > Master 5 10%
Lecturer 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 14 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#105,188
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,406
of 245,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,666
of 4,788 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,788 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.