↓ Skip to main content

The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards

Overview of attention for article published in Freshwater Biology, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
10 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
1226 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1371 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards
Published in
Freshwater Biology, December 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02204.x
Authors

N. LEROY POFF, BRIAN D. RICHTER, ANGELA H. ARTHINGTON, STUART E. BUNN, ROBERT J. NAIMAN, ELOISE KENDY, MIKE ACREMAN, COLIN APSE, BRIAN P. BLEDSOE, MARY C. FREEMAN, JAMES HENRIKSEN, ROBERT B. JACOBSON, JONATHAN G. KENNEN, DAVID M. MERRITT, JAY H. O’KEEFFE, JULIAN D. OLDEN, KEVIN ROGERS, REBECCA E. THARME, ANDREW WARNER

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 24 2%
Canada 7 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Colombia 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Ecuador 2 <1%
Other 22 2%
Unknown 1299 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 275 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 262 19%
Student > Master 230 17%
Other 89 6%
Professor 68 5%
Other 235 17%
Unknown 212 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 499 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 277 20%
Engineering 146 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 101 7%
Social Sciences 18 1%
Other 68 5%
Unknown 262 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,153,279
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Freshwater Biology
#52
of 2,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,414
of 176,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Freshwater Biology
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.